[_] SEO gone crazy
Ray Brooks
ray.userinterface at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 8 17:16:00 GMT 2009
2009/12/8 Richard Dennys <richard.dennys at gmail.com>: > It's not a bad thing. at all. misinformation reins on [_] once again. > > There is an argument you don't need a home button at all. Just your > logo linked to the index page, with Alt text in it of course, > containing a few handy concise keyword phrases. > > http://www.sunshine.co.uk/ for a good example of this. does well on > hundreds of thousands and SERPS results. See how they have matched > links and themes right at the top of the page. > > Read googles webmaster start up SEO guide. It tells you everything and > clears all this up. > Controlled, empirical experiment would be very interesting to test some of these hypotheses... although I cannot imagine how it would be done in practice. Without wishing to sound like I am backing out of the discussion, and while I think it is important to pay attention and to think about details like these in the context of SEO, the real purpose of alt text is as a help for screen readers and those without access to images. It is right that search engines should use it, but I think one's primary concern should really be the actual purpose of the attribute. After all websites are for people, not search engines. R