[_] Apache vs IIS
Rick Hurst
rick.hurst at gmail.com
Sun Jan 6 20:29:00 GMT 2008
On Jan 6, 2008 7:47 PM, Richard Davey <rich at corephp.co.uk> wrote: > It's not a guide to building a live production web server (because > no-one in their right mind would do that on Windows XP) oh yeah, sorry I just googled Richard Davey and WAMP, didn't read it properly, I just had vague recollections of you mentioning it on _. oh well, I have to get my underscore misinformation count up for 2008 :) FWIW I don't have any WAMP servers, I would generally install vmware and run a virtual debian/ubuntu machine for local AMP dev, if I had to use windows. I do however "maintain" (well actually I don't, as i'm not paid to) a php4 /mysql site which has been running on IIS on a w2k server (not mine/ not my choice/ I didn't do it guv) "faultlessly"* for years, although I did laugh when I took a backup of it recently in preparation for some changes and found a load of extra HTML files in the root of the site from a hacker claiming to have "owned" it . No-one noticed, but still a bit crap - from examining the logs it looks like they used an old known IIS webdav exploit. Arguably If that had been running Apache it wouldn't have happened, but also arguably if the client had applied any security patches at all in the seven years since they got the server, it might not have happened either. * i.e. the site is such low traffic and insignificant no-one has noticed or at least reported anything breaking. -- Rick Hurst, Web developer, Bristol, England http://www.rickhurst.co.uk