[_] Apache vs IIS
Steve Roome
steve at pepcross.com
Sat Jan 5 23:25:21 GMT 2008
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:54:15PM +0000, amias wrote:
> That said , you could have 2 servers , one doing windows apps and
> another apache one running infront of it serving static pages and
> caching the application servers pages with proxy pass or somesuch.
> This way you don't have to worry so much about your windows machine
> because it can be heavily firewalled and you can migrate applications
> to the linux box in an orderly way.
No, no no nono....nononono...nono...
Great idea, but of course, it'd be better to have 4 boxes: three run
windows and apache serves pages from whichever happens to be working
at the moment. Chuck in a squid for an easy 66% drop on the downtime
figure.
Personally, I find that apache doesn't really crash much. *
Steve
*: well for me it's fine, but god only knows how everyone else sets it
up so weirdly. :P