[_] Advice on a client gone nasty..
Steve Kirtley
steve.kirtley at gmail.com
Wed Apr 30 21:40:56 BST 2008
Hi Ed, Yeah I did suggest that we let the art director for the project - who's seperate to both of us - mediate. The client just said he was not willing to discuss it any further... Good suggestion though, Cheers Steve On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Edward Ross <underscore at rosstech.biz> wrote: > If he's being unreasonable with you, perhaps get a third party to talk > to him and mediate. Perhaps they could go over the brief vs delivered > system with him to help clarify what is needed. > > Ed. > > Steve Kirtley wrote: > > Evening all, > > > > I took a client on a few weeks ago who later accepted my quote to build > his > > website. > > > > A significant chunk of the development time (around 70% of the overall > cost) > > was for ActionScripting which I don't do, so I arranged a freelancer to > do > > that piece of the work. > > > > Now cut to a few weeks later - admittedly slightly behind the client's > > unrealistic deadline - a first proof of concept of the flash app > (functional > > rather than designed) was sent to the client for first feedback. The > client > > failed to see the functionality was there, and threw toys out of pram > > suggesting that the functionality does not match his brief (it does... > and > > he signed off on that brief). All attempts to reason with him/implement > his > > feedback/changes have failed. > > > > Situation now is he's saying he doesn't want to proceed, has no faith > that > > end product will meet his needs etc etc. > > I'm saying that cost to date will be charged. He's responding with 'no, > I > > want my deposit back' and see you in court if you think that's the case > > style antics. > > > > Now the crunch. Obviously my company has to pay the actionscripter we've > > used down in Brighton - he's done his job, it does match the spec and > it's > > obvious he's put the hours in to it... > > > > Now (shout fool now) I don't issue a formal contract, after legal advise > > suggested that they rarely pay for themselves, but the client has (by > email) > > accepted the statement of work, signed off on the brief, and paid a 20% > > deposit. Do I have any comeback, or is this something that realistically > > will not stand up and cost more in fees to try and fight? > > > > Any tips/suggestions/get over it statements welcomed... > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Steve > > > -- > underscore_ list info/archive -> > http://www.under-score.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/underscore >