[_] Jakob says something interesting for a change
Alan Parry
alan at parry.me.uk
Mon Sep 3 17:28:39 BST 2007
I think I first heard this circa 2000, infact I think you were in the lecture Matt ;-) Alan On 03/09/07, Matt Hamilton <matth at netsight.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 3 Sep 2007, at 13:15, Mark Chitty wrote: > > > Interesting article, > > > > It seems to imply that Ads are almost completelty ignored, although > > this > > can't be the case or google would go bust :o) Would be interesting > > to see > > what the sample size was. > > It says that *banner* ads are ignored. Ie the ads that look like > ads. The text-based google ones it says are still looked at. > Basically it seems people have trained themselves to look for text, > and ignore anything else. They know which areas of a page generally > have banners and ignore them if they see them there. > > So basically it means instead of paying for ads, you now should do > other things.... like paying bloggers ;) > > -Matt > > -- > Matt Hamilton matth at netsight.co.uk > Netsight Internet Solutions, Ltd. Business Vision on the Internet > http://www.netsight.co.uk +44 (0)117 9090901 > Web Design | Zope/Plone Development & Consulting | Co-location | Hosting > > > > > > -- > underscore_ list info/archive -> http://www.under-score.org.uk > -- Alan Parry alan at parry.me.uk