[_] priority 3 asp.net sites anybody?
Tim Beadle
tim.beadle at gmail.com
Wed Nov 7 13:41:01 GMT 2007
On 07/11/2007, Tim Perrett <hello at timperrett.com> wrote: > I know its possible - a friend of mine does a lot of work in .NET > with the big public body services, where they *must* meet AAA > accessibility. It cant be that difficult to find sites that require > AAA; I should have thought a lot of the government stuff would need > to meet such accessibility requirements? The new Government consultation on delivering inclusive web sites suggests not. AA it is. "The UK government has issued a consultation document on Delivering Inclusive Websites. It's not finalised, as the consultation doesn't end until November 13 but in its current state it's not a bad document; it rehashes PAS 78, recognises that the only way to find out if a website is accessible is to test it and it says that the minimum acceptable level of accessibility is Level-AA of WCAG 1.0—so valid, semantic code becomes mandatory" -- http://www.webstandards.org/2007/11/04/uk-government-accessibility-consultation/ > I thought MySpace was Cold Fusion anyway? ;) I think it has some ASP, but yeah, so did I. Tim