[_] Slow pooters....
Ben Butterfield
Ben.butterfield at propellondon.com
Thu Nov 1 17:55:56 GMT 2007
> If you are not running thin clients, are your workstations powered by > celeron processors? If so, the lack of cache memory will slow things > down. More Ram will help some, ideally a minimum of 512MB per machine. Mine is, as are most of the others. But, a quick scout around the office shows that we also have a handful of P4's (no idea which version) and an AMD X2. Mine has 512MB of RAM, but perhaps that's not enough either. > Run Task Manager (CTRL,ALT,DEL) and check what processes are being used, > particularly the ones that seem to be using lots of memory. Copy the > list and post it up if you don't know what everything is. Outlook - 72,828K Microdec RPM - 60,416K Firefox - 46,696K WINWORD - 42,264K WINWORD - 25,776K Msnmgr.exe - 19,696K Svchost - 14,092K Framework Service - 12,916K Explorer - 12,816K Skype - 11,068K RocketDock - 7,804K (take a look - it's nice) And a load of other stuff of lower memory usage. Commit Charge - 962M / 1308M (what does this mean?) > Are your workstations free of virii and spyware? If you are running a > full suite of Norton Antivirus or similar products, you may find it is > using a lot of your system resources. Try NOD32 instead. I think so - certainly haven't seen any reason to think that anything has creeped in. We use eTrust ITM, but I had to look up what that was. In doing so, I found this: http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/505417.html Could this be it? I mean, should our infrastructure be able to handle this strain?