[_] A question of elegance
Rupert Russell
rtr at comcar.co.uk
Fri Mar 9 14:15:46 GMT 2007
Hi s´unya, I didn't mean to suggest that we have found that "there is a direct import method" but would certainly be interested if someone doesn't use the intermediate csv and parsing stage. With a macro and script it is just the upload which takes any time. Rupert Russell www.comcar.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: s'unya [mailto:sunya.dickman at gmail.com] Sent: 09 March 2007 13:17 To: underscore at under-score.org.uk Subject: Re: [_] A question of elegance Hi, Excellent, thanks for the very helpful questions and suggestions. As Russel said, " ..the client views their excel spreadsheet as the main data and calculation core of their business, whilst the table that exists on the website is just a regular "snapshot"...". I like the xml/xsl suggestion except that the client needs to be able to simply put in a bunch of data, which is why I settled on CSV - the client can understand how they work and they are relatively easy to copy and paste into a textarea or something. Thanks for the backup tip... I didn't give it a thought. I am mostly worried about this method because the id field auto increments so the id can become very big very quickly. I really like the excel import/swap thing as it obviates the incrementing id problem and sounds like it might cut out all the csv parsing if there is a direct import method. I didn't realise it could be done with mysql... is there something I am missing? I will do a search on it, ... and any tips would be mucho appreciated! Thanks again. -- o o o O O O o 0 O s´unya O 0 o www.the-resort.com -- underscore_ list info/archive -> http://www.under-score.org.uk