[_] best anti virus
Tim Beadle
tim.beadle at gmail.com
Tue Jan 9 10:04:43 GMT 2007
On 09/01/07, Ben Butterfield <Ben.Butterfield at elanit.co.uk> wrote: > I switched to AVG a couple of years ago and haven't seen any evidence of any > viruses (virii?) on any of my PCs. They do a paid version if you need the > extra features. It's viruses, not viri, virii or anything else [1]. +1 for AVG, too. Stay away from Norton. How Symantec is still in business is a mystery. Actually, it's not. They've managed to make Norton the default AV of "choice" for PC World buyers in the UK and probably BestBuy, CompUSA etc, in the US. If PC World salespeople had half a brain (I know: a big ask), they'd say "don't buy Norton! It's a pile of steaming resource-hogging crap!" But d'oh! It's all a conspiracy to sell people a faster machine when theirs "mysteriously" slows down after installing NAV. Tim [1] "Those confused souls who write virii are tacitly positing the existence of the non-word virius, and declining it as though it were like filius. It's true that l/r are both linguals that sometimes get interchanged, and that f/v are just a change in voicing, but that's just reaching. Virii is still completely silly, so don't do that; otherwise, everyone will know you're just a blathering script kiddie." http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html