More information about the Underscore mailing list

[_] Tables

Tim Beadle tim.beadle at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 10:55:58 GMT 2007

On 06/02/07, Tom Gidden <tom at gidden.net> wrote:
> Enigmatic Oracle of [_],
>
> Is is "Acceptable" to use a <table> for a list of links, denoting a
> table of contents for a site (blog)?  The columns would be Date, Page
> title, Category, and Comments.  Each cell would have a link to the
> appropriate thing.

Tables are for tabular data. That sounds like tabular data...

> Thing is, it's conceptually a table, so it's okay to use a <table>,
> right?   Yeah, I'm not particularly convinced either, but I can't
> think of a more suitable way of doing it.

...so, yes, use a table.

The only thing worse than nested-table-hell cluelessness is
all-tables-are-evil cluelessness...

Tim