[_] Tables
Tim Beadle
tim.beadle at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 10:55:58 GMT 2007
On 06/02/07, Tom Gidden <tom at gidden.net> wrote: > Enigmatic Oracle of [_], > > Is is "Acceptable" to use a <table> for a list of links, denoting a > table of contents for a site (blog)? The columns would be Date, Page > title, Category, and Comments. Each cell would have a link to the > appropriate thing. Tables are for tabular data. That sounds like tabular data... > Thing is, it's conceptually a table, so it's okay to use a <table>, > right? Yeah, I'm not particularly convinced either, but I can't > think of a more suitable way of doing it. ...so, yes, use a table. The only thing worse than nested-table-hell cluelessness is all-tables-are-evil cluelessness... Tim