The Underscore Archives

Hi Joel,

Yes, all else being equal (which sadly it never is), a .co.uk is better for
a Google.co.uk listing. If the site has history on a .com, then it is
essential you migrate all that history by using permanent redirects to the
.co.uk. 

Steve

Steve Johnston
Google Consultant
--------------------------
m: +44 (0)7717 747657
t: +44 (0)1225 580024
e: steve at johnston.co.uk
w: www.johnston.co.uk/?e
--------------------------

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Hughes [mailto:jh at jojet.com] 
> Sent: 06 December 2007 18:36
> To: underscore at under-score.org.uk
> Subject: [_] .co.uk SEO
> 
> Hi [_],
> am I right in thinking that in Google terms it is 'better' to have a 
> 'co.uk' if you want to appear high in the ".co.uk" listings?
> 
> (A client can use their .co.uk or .com and I'm wondering 
> which one to use)
> 
> 
> Joel
> 
> 
> -- 
> underscore_ list info/archive -> 
> http://www.under-score.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/underscore