[_] 3D SECURE
Jonathan Burke
imprecision at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 12:00:06 GMT 2007
There are two routes for dealing with payments online. They're often referred to as the "Direct" and "Redirect" methods. The Direct method is where your site takes the details and does whatever it needs to do with the banks in the background, behind the scenes. The Redirect method is where you redirect the customer to the bank's site for the payment bit. If you use the Direct method you will have to do all the work when new systems like 3D Secure are rolled out. If you use the Redirect method, the bank will have to do that work, the new features just appearing in your payment process as they're released. Hence the Redirect method being not only more secure in that you aren't dealing with the card details, but also a lot easier for you to implement. 3D Secure was *supposed* to be rolled out early 2006. It's dragged a lot. It's a merchant option; merchants can choose to have it switched on or not. It's in their interest to do so - a 3D Secured transaction is guaranteed to them by the banks. 3D Secure does not benefit the customer. If anything it makes it worse, having to typing in their 'secret' password all the time at various sites and if their password is ever compromised - they are to fault. No comeback. If your clients need a good reason to switch to redirect - refer them to the PCI DSS guidelines they are required to adhere to otherwise. -j