[_] Open CMS systems
Rick Hurst
rick.hurst at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 10:13:36 BST 2006
On 10/3/06, Tim Beadle <tim.beadle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/10/06, Dan Efergan <dan at subsubskills.co.uk> wrote:
> > What are people's favorite Open Source CMS's. Is Drupal the one?
> > I've had a look though Open CMS but thought to get a bit of real
> > world feedback.
I have real world experience with Plone and Drupal. Plone is better for
large scale, complex deployments and scales better, but *does* need some
expertise to do anything other than basic customisation, plus more
specialist hosting.
Drupal can be figured out by most people with a bit of php/mysql, seems fine
although does seem very basic compared to plone - i'd hate to have to use it
for some of the more complex things we've done with plone (e.g complex
workflow, multi language etc), as it is more of a community tool rather than
a heavyweight CMS like plone.
this drupal v plone discussion is worth looking at - in particular this
reply from one of the plone developers:-
http://drupal.org/node/13733#comment-21790
> I guess end purpose is quite important, I'd love to find a Compliant
> > (No god damn tables) CMS with a Client friendly back-end. Any
> > suggestions?
>
> Good luck. Minimal googling seemed to indicate that all the major CMSs
> have incredibly poor usability.
obviously at this point I have to mention that Plone is compliant out of the
box to WAI-AA and section 508. It also scores well for usability - the lead
designer has just been hired by google as a usability guru (on the condition
he can spend one day a week developing Plone).
Plone ships with a tableless skin as a switchable option, but the default
skin uses a single table for columns, which in the real world most people
actually seem to prefer/ not notice.
--
Rick Hurst, Web developer, Bristol, England
http://www.rickhurst.co.uk | http://www.netsight.co.uk
>
> On 03/10/06, Dan Efergan <dan at subsubskills.co.uk> wrote:
> > What are people's favorite Open Source CMS's. Is Drupal the one?
> > I've had a look though Open CMS but thought to get a bit of real
> > world feedback.
I have real world experience with Plone and Drupal. Plone is better for
large scale, complex deployments and scales better, but *does* need some
expertise to do anything other than basic customisation, plus more
specialist hosting.
Drupal can be figured out by most people with a bit of php/mysql, seems fine
although does seem very basic compared to plone - i'd hate to have to use it
for some of the more complex things we've done with plone (e.g complex
workflow, multi language etc), as it is more of a community tool rather than
a heavyweight CMS like plone.
this drupal v plone discussion is worth looking at - in particular this
reply from one of the plone developers:-
http://drupal.org/node/13733#comment-21790
> I guess end purpose is quite important, I'd love to find a Compliant
> > (No god damn tables) CMS with a Client friendly back-end. Any
> > suggestions?
>
> Good luck. Minimal googling seemed to indicate that all the major CMSs
> have incredibly poor usability.
obviously at this point I have to mention that Plone is compliant out of the
box to WAI-AA and section 508. It also scores well for usability - the lead
designer has just been hired by google as a usability guru (on the condition
he can spend one day a week developing Plone).
Plone ships with a tableless skin as a switchable option, but the default
skin uses a single table for columns, which in the real world most people
actually seem to prefer/ not notice.
--
Rick Hurst, Web developer, Bristol, England
http://www.rickhurst.co.uk | http://www.netsight.co.uk