The Underscore Archives

Red Dot - Cool - Thanks Christian :)
I did look in the sites I found and didn't see the red dot thing - but
it was very late - so I guess its possible it was there and I missed it
- I cant remember which sites I Googled now to check.

Does anyone have experience of Red Dot? 

Having looked at the Red Dot site, they claim it produces a site that is
accessible to all (big claim!) and produces valid code. Rather ironic
seeing that if javascript is not available their whizzy site navigation
fails and many pages become inaccessible.

>From the client's site I am looking at - it has a dogs dinner of code
and mismatched tags - but I guess that could equally be more client or
web designer error - pasting from Word, legacy code being copied in,
poor template markup etc.

Anyone using Red Dot successfully?

Sam


-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Wach [mailto:needle at haystack.co.uk] 
Sent: 23 November 2006 01:27
To: underscore at under-score.org.uk
Subject: Re: [_] anyone recognise this url string


On 23 Nov 2006, at 00:59, Sam Mignano - Analyst wrote:

> I was wondering if anyone recognises the following directory structure

> and info found in a url string, and whether from it, it is possible to

> tell what cms the site is using.
>
> cps/rde/xchg

Check the source of any page that a Google search returns and you see:

<!-- PageID 2573 - published by RedDot 7.1 - 7.1.0.22 - 15062 -->

Or something similar. Which suggests:

http://www.reddot.com/products_web_content_management.htm

Christian

-- 
underscore_ list info/archive -> http://www.under-score.org.uk