[_] Digital Radio
Tim Beadle
tim.beadle at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 11:21:56 GMT 2006
On 23/11/06, Tom Gidden <tom at gidden.net> wrote: > With regards to quality, I'm not sure it is better than FM even with > perfect reception. They went for quantity over quality, AFAICR. > "Chill Radio" (or "Unknown" as the girl inside my radio calls it) is > barely LW quality at the moment, which is a shame. I can't blame > anyone for bad reception, but when it does happen the noise artifacts > are really unpleasant on DAB. And that's the problem the advertisers don't mention when they say "perfect digital (TM) quality!" - it (whether that's a CD, a DVD or DAB radio) does in no way degrade gracefully like their analogue equivalents (vinyl/tape, VHS, FM). When digital goes wrong, it's usually catastrophic (hey - it's binary!). When analogue goes wrong, there are usually shades of wrongness before total meltdown. Tim